🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents applauding your advice on growing your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of women participated in a collective professional network test this week following viral posts indicated that changing their gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system favors men who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which posts are shown to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how posts are received.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decline significantly.

The Process

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she recycled previous content with similar "assertive" language

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were softer - concise and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - like a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after seven days, stating "Each day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Not all testers experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where the same content by male and female users received vastly different reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and spread content based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."